<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-choice pharmacies deny right to birth control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fortworthfeminism.com/2008/10/27/anti-choice-pharmacies-deny-right-to-birth-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fortworthfeminism.com/2008/10/27/anti-choice-pharmacies-deny-right-to-birth-control/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen10</title>
		<link>http://fortworthfeminism.com/2008/10/27/anti-choice-pharmacies-deny-right-to-birth-control/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortworthfeminism.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is absolutely ridiculous. Not every woman has the choice (no pun intended) to go to another pharmacy! And, not even every woman takes birth control to prevent pregnancy - many teenage girls take birth control pills in order to regulate their periods and/or hormones [I&#039;m a teenager, and I know quite a few girls who do that]. It is absolutely terrible to deny someone a prescription. The sad thing is that pro-CHOICE means having the OPTION to have an abortion - it does not mean you HAVE to get one if you don&#039;t want to raise the baby yourself. At the moment, the US is pro-choice in the sense that abortion is not illegal. If abstinence-only sex-education becomes the only form of sex-ed, we already know it will have no effect, especially since Sarah-Palin-the-pro-life-abstinence-only-advocate&#039;s teenager daughter managed to have sex and get pregnant too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is absolutely ridiculous. Not every woman has the choice (no pun intended) to go to another pharmacy! And, not even every woman takes birth control to prevent pregnancy &#8211; many teenage girls take birth control pills in order to regulate their periods and/or hormones [I'm a teenager, and I know quite a few girls who do that]. It is absolutely terrible to deny someone a prescription. The sad thing is that pro-CHOICE means having the OPTION to have an abortion &#8211; it does not mean you HAVE to get one if you don&#8217;t want to raise the baby yourself. At the moment, the US is pro-choice in the sense that abortion is not illegal. If abstinence-only sex-education becomes the only form of sex-ed, we already know it will have no effect, especially since Sarah-Palin-the-pro-life-abstinence-only-advocate&#8217;s teenager daughter managed to have sex and get pregnant too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
